Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 22.06.2025 04:31

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What’s next?
Final AIDS/LifeCycle Travels Through Santa Barbara County - Noozhawk
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Why do people think Justin Bieber is worse than Joseph Stalin?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Do you think the number of sissies is on the rise?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What made you feel disgusted today?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Job openings rise in middle of trade wars, but businesses are slower to hire - MarketWatch
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Common Diabetes Drug Linked to 'Exceptional Longevity' in Women - ScienceAlert
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.